Harmonized Sales Tax
Information Notice
5
Published: May 2010
Content last reviewed: May 2010
ISBN:
978-1-4435-2093-5 (Print), 978-1-4435-2095-9 (PDF), 978-1-4435-2094-2 (HTML)
The 2009 Ontario Budget proposed a comprehensive package of tax changes. Central to this tax package is the Harmonized Sales Tax for Ontario (HST), which will come into effect on July 1, 2010. This Notice provides details of proposed measures that would build on Ontario's comprehensive tax package.
In particular, the Notice provides a general description of a temporary restriction on certain input tax credits (ITCs) for large businesses, which in this Notice will be referred to as the recapture of input tax credits (RITC) requirement or recaptured ITCs, that will be proposed to be implemented under Part IX of the federal Excise Tax Act (ETA). The RITC requirement would be similar to the existing restriction on input tax refunds for large businesses under An Act Respecting the Québec Sales Tax (QSTA).
Effective July 1, 2010, Ontario's Retail Sales Tax (RST) will be replaced with the HST in Ontario. The HST in Ontario will have a combined tax rate of 13 per cent - combining the existing five per cent federal Goods and Services Tax (GST) with an eight per cent Ontario component - and will be administered by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA).
During the initial period of the HST in Ontario, it is proposed that large businesses - generally those making taxable supplies worth more than $10 million annually, and certain financial institutions - be required to repay or 'recapture' ITCs attributable to the provincial component of HST that becomes payable, or is paid without having become payable, in respect of specified property and services acquired, or brought into Ontario, by a large business for use by that business in the province.
The rate of ITC recapture would be 100% for the first five years that the HST is in effect in Ontario. The RITC requirement would then be phased-out by reducing the rate of recapture in equal increments over the following three years. Thus, the ITC recapture rates would be:
The terms and concepts used in this Notice generally have the same meaning as they do for the purposes of Part IX of the ETA. In addition, the following terms have the following meanings:
"recapture period" means a one-year period that (a) begins immediately after June 30th of a particular calendar year and ends immediately before July 1st of the following calendar year, and (b) occurs during the period that the RITC requirement is in effect; and
"specified property or service" generally means a road vehicle, fuel used in a road vehicle, energy, a telecommunication service, or a meal or entertainment that is acquired, or brought into Ontario, by a large business for use by that business in the province. The particular circumstances in which the RITC requirement would (or would not) apply to specified property and services are described elsewhere in the Notice.
In general, only large businesses would be subject to the RITC requirement. For the purposes of the RITC requirement, a person would be considered to be a large business during a particular recapture period if the person is a GST/HST registrant and:
A person would be considered to be a large business even if the person does not have a permanent establishment in Ontario.
A public service body would not be considered to be a large business. Similarly, a person whose chief source of income is farming, as defined in the federal Income Tax Act (ITA), would not be considered to be a large business to the extent that the person is acquiring, or bringing into Ontario, a specified property or service for use in farming activities.
If a partnership is a large business and a member of the partnership (other than an individual) acquires, or brings into Ontario, a specified property or service for use in the province, and that use is in respect of the activities of the partnership (but not on account of the partnership), the member would generally be considered to be a large business in respect of that acquisition or bringing in.
If a participant in a joint venture is a large business that has made a joint venture election with the operator of the joint venture, and the operator acquires, or brings into Ontario, a specified property or service on behalf of that participant for use in the province, the operator would generally be considered to be a large business in respect of that acquisition or bringing in.
If a large business pays an allowance or a reimbursement to an employee or a partner in circumstances where ITCs would be available to the large business in respect of that allowance or reimbursement, the large business would generally be required to recapture the provincial component of those ITCs to the extent that the allowance or reimbursement is attributable to specified property and services.
In determining whether a particular person is a large business for a particular recapture period, the RITC threshold amount of that person for that recapture period would include:
In calculating the amount of consideration described in (a) and (b) above, the following amounts would be included:
However, in calculating the amount of consideration described in (a) and (b) above, the following amounts would not be included:
In calculating the amount of consideration described in (b) above, a person would include consideration attributable to taxable supplies made by an associated person that is not itself considered to be a large business.
If a person has a fiscal year that is shorter or longer than 365 days, the $10 million RITC threshold amount would be adjusted to reflect the length of that fiscal year.
If a person that is not a large business at the beginning of a recapture period has a fiscal year end during that recapture period and its RITC threshold amount exceeds $10 million at that point, the person would generally not become a large business until the beginning of the next recapture period. Conversely, if a person that is a large business at the beginning of a recapture period has a fiscal year end during that recapture period and its RITC threshold amount is below $10 million at that point, the person would generally continue to be a large business until the end of that recapture period.
Example 1: Business A has a fiscal year that ends on December 31, 2010 and its threshold amount for that fiscal year is $8 million. Therefore, Business A would not be a large business during the recapture period of July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012. At the end of its 2011 fiscal year (December 31, 2011), Business A's RITC threshold amount is $11 million. Business A would (a) not be a large business until July 1, 2012, and (b) would be a large business during the recapture period of July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013.
Example 2: Business B has a fiscal year that ends on December 31, 2010 and its RITC threshold amount for that year is $12 million. Therefore, Business B would be a large business during the recapture period of July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012. At the end of its 2011 fiscal year (December 31, 2011), Business B's RITC threshold amount is $9 million. Business B would (a) continue to be a large business until June 30, 2012, and (b) would not be a large business during the recapture period of July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013.
If the threshold amount of a person is greater than $10 million at the time it becomes a GST/HST registrant, that person (and any associated person) would generally be considered to be a large business, and would be required to begin recapturing ITCs, at that time.
If a particular corporation that is a large business acquires control of another corporation that is not a large business, the other corporation (and any associated persons) would generally be considered to be a large business when that control is acquired and would be required to begin recapturing ITCs at that time.
If two or more corporations amalgamate and the combined RITC threshold amounts of those corporations is greater than $10 million at that time, the amalgamated corporation would generally be considered to be a large business upon amalgamation and would be required to begin recapturing ITCs at that time.
If a particular person that is not a large business acquires all or substantially all of the assets of another person that is a large business and continues to carry on the business of that other person, the particular person would generally be considered to be a large business at the earlier of (a) the time that it begins to carry on the business, and (b) the time that it acquires substantially all of the assets, and would be required to begin recapturing ITCs at that earlier time.
If a person becomes a specified financial institution (which does not include selected listed financial institutions), or becomes related to one, at a particular time, the person would generally be considered to become a large business at that time (and continue to be one until it ceases to be a specified financial institution or ceases to be related to one), and would be required to begin recapturing ITCs at that time.
The RITC requirement would generally apply to specified property and services that are acquired, or brought into Ontario, by a large business for consumption or use by that business in the province. Property and services that are acquired in Ontario for consumption or use outside Ontario would generally not be subject to the RITC requirement.
In general, specified property and services would include:
However, the RITC requirement would generally not apply to:
A specified road vehicle would generally mean a vehicle that:
A trailer, semi-trailer or detachable axle would not be considered a specified road vehicle.
Specified road vehicles would include vehicles that are acquired by way of sale, or by way of lease, licence or similar arrangement. However, a person entrusted with the custody and operation of a taxi by a taxi permit-holder would generally not be considered to be acquiring a specified road vehicle for purposes of the RITC requirement.
The RITC requirement would generally apply to vehicle parts and services that are acquired, or brought into Ontario, by a large business in respect of a specified road vehicle if those parts and services are acquired, or brought into Ontario, within 12 months of the acquisition, or bringing into Ontario, of the vehicle itself (even if that vehicle was acquired, or brought into Ontario, prior to July 1, 2010): e.g. the acquisition and installation of a vehicle anti-theft system. However, the RITC requirement would generally not apply to vehicle parts and services that are acquired, or brought into Ontario, by a large business for the routine repair or maintenance of a specified road vehicle of that business.
If a large business acquires, or brings into Ontario, a specified road vehicle for the purpose of resupplying it but uses that vehicle before resupplying it, the large business would generally be required to recapture a portion of the ITCs that it claimed in respect of the acquisition or bringing in. Specifically, the large business would be required, for each month or part thereof it uses the vehicle, to recapture the portion of the provincial component of the ITCs claimed that is attributable to 2 per cent of the cost of the vehicle.
Example 3: In April 2011, a car dealership that is a large business acquires, for the purpose of resale, a vehicle that costs $20,000 and claims ITCs in respect of that acquisition (i.e., with no recapture). The dealership subsequently uses the car as a demo vehicle for two months before selling it. The dealership would recapture $64 of the ITCs claimed in respect of the acquisition of that vehicle: $20,000 (cost) × 2% × 8% (provincial component of HST) × 2 months = $64.
The RITC requirement would generally apply to fuel (other than diesel fuel) that is acquired, or brought into Ontario, by a large business, to the extent that the fuel is for use by that business in the engine of a specified road vehicle (even if that vehicle was acquired, or brought into Ontario, prior to July 1, 2010).
Specified energy would generally include electricity; gas; fuel (other than fuel used in a propulsion engine)[2]; and steam that is acquired, or brought into Ontario, for use in the province by a large business.
For purposes of the RITC requirement, consideration for a single supply of specified energy would include consideration attributable to transportation services and fees (e.g., delivery charges or regulatory fees) that are incidental to the supply of energy. However, consideration for a supply of specified energy would generally not include consideration for transportation services that are not incidental to the supply of energy itself.
The RITC requirement will generally not apply to specified energy acquired by a sponsor or organizer of a convention for use exclusively at that convention. In addition, the RITC requirement will generally not apply to specified energy used to heat asphalt that is for use in the construction of an eligible road.
Specified energy acquired by a lessee as part of a single supply of a real property lease would not be subject to the RITC requirement (as the lessee would not, for purposes of the GST/HST, be acquiring a supply of energy). Conversely, a lessor that provides energy to a lessee as part of a single supply of a real property lease would not be able to claim relief from the RITC requirement on the basis of the manner in which the lessee uses that energy: e.g., if the lessee uses the energy directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale.
The RITC requirement would generally not apply to specified energy used by a large business directly in the production of:
The RITC requirement would, however, generally apply to specified energy used by the large business to facilitate such production (i.e., not directly in the production process), including specified energy that is used to light, heat, air condition or ventilate a production facility.
Example 4: Large Business A, which sells widgets, acquires electricity for use in one of its production facilities in Ontario. The electricity is used to operate the widget producing machines, to provide light, heat and ventilation in the building, to operate a building security system, and to run appliances in a dining area in the building.
The RITC requirement would not apply to the portion of the electricity used in the production facility to operate the widget producing machines (because that electricity is used directly in the production process) but would apply to the portion of the electricity used otherwise (because that electricity is not used directly in the production process).
The RITC requirement would generally apply to specified energy used by a large business to produce tangible personal property that is used:
The RITC requirement would generally not apply to specified energy used by a large business to produce another form of energy that is used in a manner whereby the RITC requirement would not apply if the specified energy were used directly: e.g. if diesel fuel were used in a generator to produce electricity used directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale, the RITC requirement would generally not apply to the portion of the diesel fuel attributable to the electricity subsequently used directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale.
For purposes of the RITC requirement, 'production' would generally mean the assembling, processing or manufacturing of tangible personal property to make other tangible personal property that is different from the first property by its nature or characteristics, and would include:
Production would also generally include the following activities when performed in conjunction with one of the production activities described above:
However, 'production' would generally not include (a) the storage of finished products or (b) the assembly, processing or manufacturing of tangible personal property in a retail establishment.
For purposes of the RITC requirement, 'production equipment' would generally mean machinery, tools, equipment and accessories used directly in the production of tangible personal property, and would include:
However, 'production equipment' would generally not include (a) containers used for the delivery or transportation of property and (b) vehicles, other than vehicles for use elsewhere than on a public roadway or a railroad.
For purposes of the RITC requirement, specified energy used by the following kinds of businesses would generally not be considered to be used in the production of tangible personal property for sale:
To simplify compliance with the RITC requirement, a large business producing tangible personal property for sale (and carrying on such production activities primarily in Ontario) would generally be able to elect to use a production proxy to determine what portion of the specified energy that it acquires for use in Ontario would be considered to be used directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale (and hence not subject to the RITC requirement).
This production proxy would be based on the Canadian detail of the North American Industry Classification System for 2007 ("NAICS Canada 2007"), which is a statistical tool that classifies particular sectors, subsectors and industries into categories based on production-oriented principles.
Specifically, if the most significant business activity of a large business falls into one of the 24 categories described below (which are based on NAICS Canada 2007 categories), it would be eligible to use one of three fixed percentages to determine the portion of the total amount of specified energy that it acquires for use in Ontario that would be considered to be used directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale. These percentages reflect the average proportion of energy used directly in such production activities in a particular industrial sector.
Large businesses whose most significant business activity do not fall within any of the foregoing categories (or that do not carry on their production activities primarily in Ontario) would not be entitled to use this proxy.
The election to use the proxy would have to be filed with the CRA before the beginning of a particular recapture period and would generally apply for that entire recapture period. For example, a large business whose most significant business activity falls within the category of wood product manufacturing (NAICS Canada 2007 category # 321) could, instead of tracking the amount of specified energy that it uses in production, file an election with the CRA before the beginning of a recapture period and, for each reporting period during that recapture period, the business would be deemed to use 87 per cent of the specified energy that it acquires for use in Ontario directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale.
The RITC requirement would generally not apply to specified energy used by a large business directly in activities that are eligible scientific research and experimental development (SR&ED) activities in Ontario for purposes of the Taxation Act, 2007 (Ontario). A large business engaged in SR&ED activities in its current taxation year that is eligible for, and actually claims, SR&ED expenditures or investment tax credits for income tax purposes in that taxation year would generally not be required to recapture ITCs available in respect of the specified energy used directly in the qualifying SR&ED activities.
A large business would be able to either track the actual amount of specified energy used directly in qualifying SR&ED activities, or use the following formula (i.e., the SR&ED proxy) to determine what portion of the specified energy would be considered, for purposes of the RITC requirement, to be used directly in qualifying SR&ED activities.
A = B/C, where:
"A" is the proportion (expressed as a percentage) of the specified energy considered to be used directly in qualifying SR&ED activities in Ontario;
"B" is the total amount of the portion of the salaries and wages of employees of the large business directly engaged in SR&ED activities in Ontario that is attributable to SR&ED activities; and
"C" is the total amount of salaries and wages of employees of the large business in Ontario.
If a large business is using both the SR&ED proxy and the production proxy, it would apply the first proxy to the specified energy it acquires for use in Ontario, and then apply the other proxy to the residual amount (i.e. instead of adding the two percentages together and applying the sum of these two percentages). This 'ordered' approach to applying the proxies to specified energy would help ensure that some portion of that energy would be subject to the RITC requirement (reflecting the fact that some energy would be attributable to other uses, such as overhead).
Example 5: For purposes of the RITC requirement, the most significant business activity of Large Business A (LBA) is food manufacturing (311) and it is therefore using the 87% production proxy. It is also using a 25% SR&ED proxy (as 25% of the salaries and wages of its employees directly engaged in SR&ED activities in Ontario is attributable to SR&ED activities). In its August 2012 reporting period, LBA has $800 in available ITCs that are attributable to the provincial component of the HST payable in respect of specified energy it acquired for use in Ontario during that reporting period.
LBA would first apply the SR&ED proxy ($800 × 25% = $200) and then apply the production proxy to the residual amount ($600 × 87% = $522). It would, therefore, have to recapture $78 in ITCs in respect of that specified energy ($800 − ($200 + $522) = $78).
Note that a large business that acquires specified energy that is later re-supplied by that business (in addition to specified energy used by that business in producing tangible personal property for sale or in eligible SR&ED activities) would first have to deduct the proportion of its specified energy that is re-supplied from the total specified energy it acquired before applying any proxy.
Specified telecommunication services would generally include:
Thus, the RITC requirement would generally apply to services such as local and long-distance telephone, cable and pay television, satellite television, facsimile and electronic mail, video, audio and computer link-ups and data transmission acquired by a large business for use in Ontario by that large business.
However, the RITC requirement would generally not apply to:
Supplies that are provided by means of telecommunication, but are not themselves telecommunication services, would generally not be subject to the RITC requirement. Examples of supplies that are provided by means of telecommunication include building surveillance services, news services offered by press agencies, a right to access a data bank, and services provided by means of a 1-900 telephone service.
If a large business receives an invoice for a single supply that includes both specified telecommunication services and other services and/or goods (i.e., that are not subject to the RITC requirement), and the large business cannot readily ascertain which portion of the provincial component of the HST applicable to the supply is attributable to these other services and/or goods, the large business would be allowed to use the following proxies to make that determination.
Specified property and services would generally include food and beverages for human consumption (meals) and entertainment that are acquired by a large business in Ontario, to the extent that the meals or entertainment are subject to the existing (generally 50%) ITC repayment requirement in the ETA (specified meals and entertainment).
Thus, meals and entertainment subject to the RITC requirement would include:
Conversely, meals and entertainment that would not be subject to the RITC requirement would generally include:
A large business would generally be required to account for recaptured ITCs in its GST/HST return for the reporting period in which the ITCs first become available: i.e., in the first reporting period in which the provincial component of the HST to which the ITCs relate becomes payable, or is paid without having become payable.
However, if a large business is currently required under the ETA to repay ITCs in respect of a particular specified property or service in a reporting period other than the reporting period in which the ITCs first become available, the large business would generally be required, under the RITC requirement, to recapture ITCs in respect of that same specified property or service in that same reporting period.
Example 6: A large business is currently required to repay 50% of the ITCs that it claims for certain meal and entertainment expenses in the reporting period immediately following the end of its fiscal year. To the extent that the meals and entertainment are specified property or services, the large business would generally be required to recapture the remaining portion of the provincial component of those ITCs in that same reporting period.
If a large business is the recipient of a supply of a specified property or service, and the consideration for the supply first becomes due, or is paid without having become due, after October 14, 2009 and before May 2010, then to the extent that
the large business would generally be required to self-assess the provincial component of the HST in respect of that property or part of the service either: (i) in the GST/HST return for the reporting period of the large business that includes July 1, 2010, if the due date for that return is before November 2010, or (ii) in any other case, in prescribed form and before November 2010. The large business would then recapture any ITCs available in respect of that provincial component of the HST for the reporting period in which the ITCs first become available.
As outlined in the CRA News Release and Backgrounder of January 4, 2010 entitled "Government of Canada announces new electronic filing requirements for GST/HST registrants", GST/HST registrants who are subject to the RITC requirement (large businesses) would be required to calculate and report their ITCs in the GST/HST NETFILE return (GST/HST NETFILE is a free internet-based service that allows persons to file their returns with the CRA on-line). A large business would complete the GST/HST NETFILE return in the following manner:
Generally, if a registrant fails to report recaptured ITCs in the appropriate reporting period, any subsequent reporting of the recaptured ITCs would be done through an amended return for that period.
Example 7: In its September 2010 reporting period, a large business that is a monthly filer pays $2,000 in HST in the course of acquiring property, all of which is for use (and not resupply) in its commercial activities in Ontario. Of this amount, $1,300 is attributable to the acquisition of specified property by the large business (this $1,300 of HST is made up of a 5% federal portion of $500 and an 8% provincial portion of $800). The business does not acquire any specified property or services subject to ITC recapture in BC.
In its GST/HST NETFILE return for the September reporting period, the large business indicates that it is required to recapture ITCs and:
It is important to note that large businesses would not be allowed to simply forego claiming ITCs in order to fulfill the RITC requirement (even if the effect on net tax would be the same). In this way, the RITC requirement differs from the existing restriction on input tax refunds in Québec. Failing to recapture ITCs as and when required could result in penalties.
Example 8: Large Business A (LBA), which is a monthly filer, routinely acquires specified property in Ontario. Rather than claim the ITCs for this property in the GST/HST return for the reporting period in which the ITCs first become available, LBA waits until the end of its fiscal year and claims the ITCs at that point. It also recaptures the provincial portion of those ITCs at that point. LBA would generally be subject to interest and penalties in this situation because it should have recaptured the provincial portion of the ITCs in the reporting period when the ITCs first became available.
This proposed approach to reporting and accounting for recaptured ITCs is necessary in order to allow administrators to properly allocate GST/HST revenues.
In order to help simplify compliance with the RITC requirement, a large business would generally be allowed to make an election to use an estimation, installment and reconciliation approach to accounting for recaptured ITCs (Estimation/Instalment Approach). The election would be filed with CRA after the end of a large business's fiscal year and would apply for at least one year.
Under the Estimation/Instalment Approach, for each province that has an RITC requirement, a large business would:
Thus, under the Estimation/Instalment Approach, a large business would still have to identify the specified property and services that it acquires or brings into a province in such a way that it could determine the actual amount of available ITCs that are subject to the RITC requirement. However, this Approach would allow the large business to account for these recaptured ITCs on an annual basis and on the basis of aggregate financial information.
Large businesses would still be able to use any proxies otherwise available to them when using the Estimation/Instalment Approach (e.g. the proxy for specified energy used directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale).
At the beginning of a fiscal year, a large business that has filed the appropriate election would estimate the amount of ITCs it would be required to recapture, for each province with an RITC requirement, during that fiscal year (Estimated RITCs). This estimate would be based on:
A large business would not be allowed to use an Estimated RITCs amount that is less than the actual amount of ITCs that the large business was (or would have been) required to recapture in its previous fiscal year. However, it could use a greater amount.
Example 9: Large Business A (LBA), which has a fiscal year that ends December 31, 2010, elects in January 2011 to use the Estimation/Instalment Approach. In the period from January to March 2011, it reviews its financial records for its 2010 fiscal year, as well as its business plans for its 2011 fiscal year, and determines that:
Therefore, LBA's Estimated RITCs for Ontario for its 2011 fiscal year would be $8,400 ($6,000 + $2,400).
A large business using the Estimation/Instalment Approach would generally be required to report its Estimated RITCs, for each province with an RITC requirement, over the course of a year-long period that begins three months after the beginning of its fiscal year and ends three months after the end of that fiscal year (the Instalment Period).
To determine the amount of recaptured ITCs that must be reported in each reporting period during the Instalment Period, a large business would generally divide the relevant Estimated RITC amount by the number of GST/HST reporting periods in the Instalment Period (e.g., a monthly filer would divide the amount by 12). The equal installment amounts would be reported in the GST/HST NETFILE return of the large business as recaptured ITCs for each reporting period in the particular Instalment Period.
Example 10: LBA (from the previous example), which is a monthly filer, has $8,400 of Estimated RITCs for Ontario for its 2011 fiscal year. LBA would divide this Estimated RITC amount by the 12 monthly reporting periods that occur in the Instalment Period starting April 1, 2011 and ending March 31, 2012.
LBA would report $700 ($8,400/12) in the recaptured ITCs field for Ontario in the GST/HST NETFILE return for each monthly reporting period that occurs in the Instalment Period from April 2011 through March 2012.
After the end of its fiscal year, a large business using the Estimation/Instalment Approach would review its financial records and determine the actual amount of ITCs it would have been required to recapture, for each province with an RITC requirement, during that year, if the RITC requirement had been in effect throughout that year (Actual RITCs).
The Actual RITCs amount would be compared to the amount of recaptured ITCs that the large business reported in its GST/HST returns for the same fiscal year[3]. The large business would report any differences between these two amounts in its GST/HST return for a reporting period that includes a date that occurs within three months after the end of its fiscal year (e.g., if a fiscal year ends on December 31st of a particular calendar year, the reconciliation should take place in a reporting period that includes a date before April 1 of the next calendar year[4]).
Example 11: In March 2012, LBA (from the previous two examples) determines that, for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2011, its Actual RITCs were $9,000. It then compares this amount to the amount of recaptured ITCs that it reported during that same fiscal year, which is the sum of:
The difference between the two amounts would be $900
($9,000 - $8,100) and LBA would report this additional $900 in its GST/HST NETFILE return for the March 2012 reporting period (i.e., in addition to the $700 installment payment for that same reporting period).
As it does not anticipate any material differences in its recaptured ITCs for its 2012 fiscal year (vis-à-vis its 2011 fiscal year), LBA would use $9,000 as its Estimated RITCs amount for its 2012 fiscal year. LBA would therefore report $750 of recaptured ITCs (i.e., $9,000/12 reporting periods = $750) for Ontario in each monthly reporting period in the Instalment Period from April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013.
If a large business:
and the specified property or service is for use in Ontario (in whole or in part) by the large business, then that large business would, under the RITC requirement, generally be required to account for the provincial portion of ITCs that are available (or would be available if the provincial component of the HST were payable) in respect of that acquisition, or bringing into Ontario, of the specified property or service (i.e., even if the property or service was acquired, or brought into the province, for consumption or use exclusively in commercial activities of the large business).
If a large business is a specified member of a qualifying group of closely related persons that has made an election for nil consideration under the ETA, and that large business acquires a specified property or service from another specified member of the same qualifying group, the large business would, under the RITC requirement, generally be required to account for the provincial portion of ITCs that are available (or would be available if the supply were not deemed to have been made for no consideration) in respect of that acquisition of the specified property or service.
If a supply of a specified property or service is made for no consideration, or for consideration that is less than fair market value, between persons who are not dealing with each other at arm's length for purposes of the ETA, the recipient of the supply (if it is a large business) would generally be required to recapture ITCs as if the supply had been made at fair market value (i.e., even if the property or service was acquired, or brought into the province, for consumption or use exclusively in commercial activities of the large business).
Large businesses that fail to account for recaptured ITCs in the proper manner would generally be subject to penalties.
Existing anti-avoidance rules in the ETA would generally apply to transactions to which the RITC requirement applies. Additional anti-avoidance rules may be implemented in order to maintain the integrity of the GST/HST and the RITC requirement.
For more information on the measures described in this notice, please call the Canada Revenue Agency:
[1] The RITC requirement in respect of selected listed financial institutions will be described in a separate information notice.
[2] However, fuel for use in the engine of a specified road vehicle may be subject to the RITC requirement: please see the section of this Notice on Specified Road Vehicles.
[3] If this reconciliation is made in respect of a particular fiscal year, and the HST was only in effect for part of that year (e.g. a fiscal year ending December 31, 2010), the Actual RITC amount for that fiscal year should be adjusted to reflect the portion of the fiscal year during which the HST was in effect.
[4] To simplify administration, no reconciliation can take place before April 2011. If a large business using the Estimation/Instalment Approach has a fiscal year that ends after the implementation of the HST in July 2010 and before January 2011, it would be required to perform the relevant reconciliation in the reporting period that includes April 1, 2011.
Cette publication est disponible en français sous le titre "Exigence de récupération temporaire de crédits de taxe sur les intrants".